Adequate Security? Our Legal Take: Father Injured in Watermill Robbery-Shooting

(KHOU News)

(KHOU News)

Adequate Security? Our Legal Take: Father Injured in Watermill Robbery-Shooting

Local News

A man was reportedly robbed and shot in front of his wife and child while getting water from a Watermill Tuesday night, January 19, 2016.

According to KHOU News, the robbery occurred outside of a “Watermill located at East Crosstimbers and Farnsworth,” around 9:30pm. A father was apparently getting water when two to three suspects held him at gunpoint and demanded money and personal belongings.

Once the victim complied, the suspects apparently shot him in the neck and turned the gun on his wife and teenage daughter, who had been sitting inside their car. The suspects reportedly fled once the mother threw her cellphone to them. The father was transported to Ben Taub Hospital in serious but stable condition, per media reports.

Police have not yet identified the suspects, once again leaving Watermill patrons concerned for their safety. Three gunman apparently robbed and shot a victim outside a Watermill on Veterans Memorial and Antoine Drive in May 2015.

Our Legal Take

Patrons have a right to be safe and secure while on the premises of the establishment that they are visiting. Given the reported history of violence at another local Watermill, The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided to Houston Watermill patrons and whether this shooting may have been prevented.

  • What parking lot security measures, such as bright lighting and surveillance cameras, were in place to protect patrons and deter crime?
  • Were any additional security precautions implemented by the Watermill or parking lot owner or management following reports of a May 2015 robbery-shooting at another location?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all patrons legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the owner or management of the property where the Watermill was located failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the victim may elect to seek justice and pursue a legal claim for his injuries.

Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the victim retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.  Based upon its prior experience in handling property security negligence claims, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed.

We’ve Recovered Millions for Victims of Property Security Negligence…Contact us Now for a Free Consultation.

Headline Frame Fox News DeskThe Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have recovered millions of dollars for our Clients, and we recently obtained a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice


Choosing the Right Attorney

Selecting the right attorney for you or your family is highly important. You must feel confident that the attorney you hire has a complete understanding of the law applicable to your particular case, and has successful experience in handling such cases.

Important: Do not hire a lawyer who has violated the Rules of Professional Conduct!!!

You should not hire an attorney who calls you or visits you unsolicited, or anyone that contacts you directly to offer legal services. This activity is strictly prohibited by Rule 7.3 of the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which states as follows:

ABA Center for Professional ResponsibilityA LAWYER “SHALL NOT” CONTACT A PROSPECTIVE CLIENT THROUGH A “LIVE TELEPHONE” OR AN “IN-PERSON” VISIT.

– RULE 7.3, ABA MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.

If an attorney, or someone acting on behalf of an attorney, contacts you in this manner, that attorney is in violation of this Rule. This unethical and unprofessional activity on the part of the lawyer is good sign that you should stay away. It is imperative that you are represented by an attorney who is capable of advocating for you within the confines of the law, and an attorney who fails to abide by the Rules of Professional Conduct is probably not the best fit. In fact, any such attorney should be immediately reported to the local State Bar Association. If you have been contacted in such an unsolicited manner, contact us and we’ll assist you in filing a report.

Contingency Fees Disclaimer: “Contingent attorneys’ fees refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.