The Legal Herald
(Fox 13 News)
Apartment Security Negligence? Our Legal Take: Woman Shot in Summit Arbor Circle Home Invasion
Did negligent security contribute to this tragic home invasion shooting? Read Our Legal Take to find out if the victim may have a claim for compensation.
Local News
A woman was reportedly shot in her Summit Arbor Circle apartment home during a robbery-home invasion Saturday morning, April 23, 2016.
According to Fox13 News, “two suspects approached the victim outside the home in the 2700 block of Summit Arbor Circle around 7 a.m. and one of the suspects put a gun to her head and guided her back to the apartment.” The assailants apparently shot the victim in the abdomen before fleeing the scene with several stolen items. The victim was transported to Regional One in critical condition. Her current condition has not been released.
Police are still searching for the two suspects, presumably leaving local residents once again concerned for their safety. Police reports indicate a home invasion-sexual assault occurred at The Summit Apartments on Summit Arbor Circle in March 2015.
Our Legal Take
Apartment residents have a right to feel safe and secure within the community. Given the reported history of violence in the neighborhood, The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the Summit Arbor Circle apartment complex and whether this unconscionable attack may have been prevented.
- How did the intruders gain entry to the property? What security measures, such as gated entry, bright lighting, security patrols, and surveillance cameras, were in place at the time of the shooting?
- Were any additional security precautions implemented by the property owner, following the reported March 2015 Summit Arbor Circle apartment home invasion, to deter crime and protect residents?
Generally, property owners are required to protect all residents legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the complex owner or management company failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the victim may seek justice and elect to pursue a legal claim for her injuries.
Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the victim retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.
We’ve Recovered Millions for Victims of Apartment Security Negligence…Contact us Now for a Free Consultation.
The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have recovered millions of dollars for our Clients, and recently obtained a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.
We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.
Choosing the Right Attorney
Selecting the right attorney for you or your family is highly important. You must feel confident that the attorney you hire has a complete understanding of the law applicable to your particular case, and has successful experience in handling such cases.
Important: Do not hire a lawyer who has violated the Rules of Professional Conduct!!!
You should not hire an attorney who calls you or visits you unsolicited, or anyone that contacts you directly to offer legal services. This activity is strictly prohibited by Rule 7.3 of the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which states as follows:
A LAWYER “SHALL NOT” CONTACT A PROSPECTIVE CLIENT THROUGH A “LIVE TELEPHONE” OR AN “IN-PERSON” VISIT.
– RULE 7.3, ABA MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.
If an attorney, or someone acting on behalf of an attorney, contacts you in this manner, that attorney is in violation of this Rule. This unethical and unprofessional activity on the part of the lawyer is good sign that you should stay away. It is imperative that you are represented by an attorney who is capable of advocating for you within the confines of the law, and an attorney who fails to abide by the Rules of Professional Conduct is probably not the best fit. In fact, any such attorney should be immediately reported to the local State Bar Association. If you have been contacted in such an unsolicited manner, contact us and we’ll assist you in filing a report.
Contingency Fees Disclaimer: “Contingent attorneys’ fees refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.”