September 27, 2024

Brandon Jobe Armelin Jr. Killed in Shooting Outside San Antonio, TX Bar. Security Negligence?

Brandon Jobe Armelin Jr. Killed in Shooting Outside San Antonio, TX Bar. (KSAT.com)

Brandon Jobe Armelin Jr. San Antonio, TX Shooting.

We have over 25 years of experience representing victims of security failures across the United States, and we have recovered nearly $250 million dollars for our Clients. Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available to the family of Brandon Jobe Armelin Jr..

San Antonio, TX News – Two people are dead after a shooting outside a bar late Sunday night, September 22, 2024.

As reported by KENS5.com, “[the shooting] happened around 10:35 p.m. in the 2600 block of Rigsby Avenue near Covington Park. Police say when they arrived at [a local sports bar], they found two men fatally shot and a third man wounded by gunshot. He was taken to BAMC in stable condition.”
KSAT.com is reporting, “[a] 14-year-old boy and a 21-year-old man were pronounced dead at the scene…One man was transported to the hospital and is now stable.”
According to KSAT.com, “The Bexar County Medical Examiner has identified the 21-year-old man killed…Brandon Jobe Armelin Jr. was identified on Thursday as the man killed in the shooting.”

The investigation is ongoing.

Legal Options for Family of Brandon Jobe Armelin Jr.?

OUR LEGAL TAKE

FORMER CLIENT: I had lawyers calling me, and friends telling me who I should hire…I trusted in The Murray Law Firm and I’m glad I did.

Bar and parking lot visitors and guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises they are visiting. The level of security provided at the property is of significance, and is a relevant consideration when analyzing whether this shooting may have been prevented. The following questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided:

- Have prior incidents of violence been reported on or near the property?
- Were any security personnel at the property?
- Were security measures added after any prior incidents?
- Was the property owner or manager aware of any suspicious persons or suspicious activity on the property prior to the shooting?
- Have authorities been to the property on prior occasions?

Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. Should the investigation into this incident reveal facts that establish that the property owner or management lacked adequate security to protect its residents and visitors, the family of Brandon Jobe Armelin Jr. may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for their loss.

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed. The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the family of Brandon Jobe Armelin Jr. retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect their interests.

Successful Legal Outcomes in Similar Cases?

OUR RESULTS: NEARLY $250 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained nearly $250 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including:

A $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property.
Settlement in excess of $10 million dollars for a victim of gun violence at an apartment complex.
Settlement in excess of $10 million dollars for a family who lost a loved one to gun violence at a commercial property.

We offer our legal assistance, if desired. We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888-842-1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

How to Choose and Hire the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

September 26, 2024

Brock Cambell Killed in Bluefield, WV Bar Shooting. Security Failure?

By The Murray Law Firm

Brock Cambell Killed in Bluefield, WV Bar Shooting. (WVVA.com)

Brock Cambell Bar Shooting: Legal Options?

We have over 25 years of experience representing victims of security failures across the United States, and we have recovered nearly $250 million dollars for our Clients. Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available to the family of Brock Cambell.

Bluefield, WV News – A man was shot at a bar early Saturday morning, September 14, 2024.

As reported by WCHStv.com, “deputies and the Bluefield police responded to reports of a 37-year-old victim with multiple gunshot wounds at the West Virginia University Emergency Room in the area. The authorities learned that a shooting took place at [a bar] on the 1100 block of Coal Heritage Road around 3:30 a.m.”

Register-Herald.com is reporting, “[t]he victim was 37-year-old Brock Cambell from Maybeury in McDowell County.”

According to the report, “[h]e sustained multiple gunshot wounds and was transported to Roanoke Carillion Hospital where he later succumbed to his injuries.”

The investigation is ongoing.

Legal Options for Family of Brock Cambell?

OUR LEGAL TAKE

FORMER CLIENT: I had lawyers calling me, and friends telling me who I should hire…I trusted in The Murray Law Firm and I’m glad I did.

Bar visitors and guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises they are visiting. The level of security provided at the property is of significance, and is a relevant consideration when analyzing whether this shooting may have been prevented. The following questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided:

Have prior incidents of violence been reported on or near the property?
Were any security personnel at the property?
Were security measures added after any prior incidents?
Was the property owner or manager aware of any suspicious persons or suspicious activity on the property prior to the shooting?
Have authorities been to the property on prior occasions?

Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. Should the investigation into this incident reveal facts that establish that the property owner or management lacked adequate security to protect its residents and visitors, the family of Brock Cambell may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for their loss.

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed. The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the family of Brock Cambell retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect his interests.

Successful Legal Outcomes in Similar Cases?

OUR RESULTS: NEARLY $250 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained nearly $250 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including:

A $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property.
Settlement in excess of $10 million dollars for a victim of gun violence at an apartment complex.
Settlement in excess of $10 million dollars for a family who lost a loved one to gun violence at a commercial property.

We offer our legal assistance, if desired. We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888-842-1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

How to Choose and Hire the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

September 25, 2024

Romeo Cedillo Killed in Shooting Outside San Antonio, TX Bar. Security Negligence?

By The Murray Law Firm

Romeo Cedillo Killed in Shooting Outside San Antonio, TX Bar. (KSAT.com)

Romeo Cedillo San Antonio, TX Shooting.

We have over 25 years of experience representing victims of security failures across the United States, and we have recovered nearly $250 million dollars for our Clients. Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available to the family of Romeo Cedillo.

San Antonio, TX News – Two people are dead after a shooting outside a bar late Sunday night, September 22, 2024.

As reported by KENS5.com, “[the shooting] happened around 10:35 p.m. in the 2600 block of Rigsby Avenue near Covington Park. Police say when they arrived at [a local sports bar], they found two men fatally shot and a third man wounded by gunshot. He was taken to BAMC in stable condition.”
KSAT.com is reporting, “[a] 14-year-old boy and a 21-year-old man were pronounced dead at the scene…One man was transported to the hospital and is now stable.”
According to KSAT.com, “The Bexar County Medical Examiner identified a teenager who was shot and killed…Romeo Cedillo, 14, died of a gunshot wound to his neck and shoulder area.”

The investigation is ongoing.

Legal Options for Family of Romeo Cedillo?

OUR LEGAL TAKE

FORMER CLIENT: I had lawyers calling me, and friends telling me who I should hire…I trusted in The Murray Law Firm and I’m glad I did.

Bar and parking lot visitors and guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises they are visiting. The level of security provided at the property is of significance, and is a relevant consideration when analyzing whether this shooting may have been prevented. The following questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided:

- Have prior incidents of violence been reported on or near the property?
- Were any security personnel at the property?
- Were security measures added after any prior incidents?
- Was the property owner or manager aware of any suspicious persons or suspicious activity on the property prior to the shooting?
- Have authorities been to the property on prior occasions?

Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. Should the investigation into this incident reveal facts that establish that the property owner or management lacked adequate security to protect its residents and visitors, the family of Romeo Cedillo may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for their loss.

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed. The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the family of Romeo Cedillo retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect their interests.

Successful Legal Outcomes in Similar Cases?

OUR RESULTS: NEARLY $250 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained nearly $250 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including:

A $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property.
Settlement in excess of $10 million dollars for a victim of gun violence at an apartment complex.
Settlement in excess of $10 million dollars for a family who lost a loved one to gun violence at a commercial property.

We offer our legal assistance, if desired. We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888-842-1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

How to Choose and Hire the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.