Jotham Simmons Myrtle Beach Shooting: Legal Claims Available?
We have over 25 years of experience representing victims of security failures across the United States, and we have recovered nearly $250 million dollars for our Clients. Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available to the family of Jotham Simmons.
Myrtle Beach, SC News – One man is dead, another man injured after a shooting at a bar early Monday morning, December 16, 2024.
As reported by WMBFnews.com, “[t]he incident happened around 2:30 a.m. Monday at [the Tavern] off Highway 17 Bypass South.”
WPDE.com is reporting, “[r]esponding officers secured the witnesses inside the bar and moved them out of the crime scene. While police were on the scene, they were told of an individual arriving at the hospital with a gunshot wound. Officers found a trail of blood leading outside the bar into the parking lot.”
According to WMBFnews.com, “Jotham Simmons, 43, of Myrtle Beach, was taken to the hospital after the shooting, where he died…The other person shot was also taken to the hospital. It is unclear how they are doing now.”
The investigation is ongoing.
Legal Options for Family of Jotham Simmons?
OUR LEGAL TAKE
Bar visitors and guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises they are visiting. The level of security provided at the property is of significance, and is a relevant consideration when analyzing whether this shooting may have been prevented. The following questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided:
-
- Have prior incidents of violence been reported on or near the property?
- Were any security personnel at the property?
- Were security measures added after any prior incidents?
- Was the property owner or manager aware of any suspicious persons or suspicious activity on the property prior to the shooting?
- Have authorities been to the property on prior occasions?
Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. Should the investigation into this incident reveal facts that establish that the property owner or management lacked adequate security to protect its residents and visitors, the family of Jotham Simmons may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for their loss. In addition, any injured victim may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for their injuries.
The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed. The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the family of Jotham Simmons and any injured victim retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect their interests.
Successful Legal Outcomes in Similar Cases?
OUR RESULTS: NEARLY $250 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS
The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained nearly $250 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including:
- A $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property.
- Settlement in excess of $10 million dollars for a victim of gun violence at an apartment complex.
- Settlement in excess of $10 million dollars for a family who lost a loved one to gun violence at a commercial property.
We offer our legal assistance, if desired. We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888-842-1616. Consultations are free and confidential.
How to Choose and Hire the Right Attorney (Click Here)